The Buddha's Charter for Inquiry:
analysis of the Kalama Sutta
Christopher Titmuss
The words of the Buddha to the
Kalama People of north India constitute one
of the most profound statements ever uttered
in the history of humanity.
It deserves to be examined and reflected upon
by one and all, especially those with authority,
whether religious, social, educational, scientific
or political.
The Kalama Sutta (Discourse) requires our fullest
attention so that we truly comprehend the significance
of this ‘charter for inquiry.’
If we thoroughly understand this profound teaching,
we will liberate ourselves from grasping onto
second hand knowledge, unexamined views and
from naïve transference onto an authority
figure.
The Buddha’s talk to the Kalamas people
in the town of Kesaputta encourages all of us
to not only question authority but to acknowledge
how easily we give sanction to authority through
being impressionable.
THE KALAMA PEOPLE:
Numerical Discourses of The Buddha.
To the Kalamas. Book of Threes 6.5
from the Sacred Literature Series
Rowan and Littlefield Publishers, London and
New York
translated by Nyanaponika There and Bhikkhu
Bodhi
The Kalamas came to the Buddha
and said that some priests, well-educated people,
religious teachers and yogis elucidate their
teachings and views and disparage and vilify
the teachings of others. Then others come and
do the same about those teachers. As a result,
the Kalamas said they ‘experience perplexity
and doubt about who speaks the truth and who
speaks falsehood.’
THE BUDDHA:
“It is fitting for you
to be perplexed. Doubt has arisen in you about
a perplexing matter.
Do not accept anything because:
1. Of repeated oral transmission
2. Of lineage or tradition
3. It has been widely stated
4. It has been written in books, such as scriptures
5. It is logical and reasonable
6. Of inferring and drawing conclusions
7. It has been thought out
8. Of acceptance and conviction through a theory
9. The speaker appears competent
10. Of respect for the teacher
The Buddha went on: “When you know for
yourselves ‘these things are unwholesome,
these things are blamable, these things are
censured by the wise, these things, if undertaken
and practiced, lead to harm and suffering,’
then you should abandon them.’
He explained to the Kalamas that a person whose
thoughts are controlled by greed, hate and delusion
would destroy life, take what is not given,
engage in sexual abuse and lie. This will be
conducive to his or her harm and suffering for
a long time.
The Buddha then repeated his charter for inquiry.
‘It was for this reason that we said do
not accept anything because of oral transmission….or
out of respect for the teacher.
For those without greed, hate and delusion,
his thoughts are not controlled by
them, he will abstain from causing suffering..
Undertaken and practiced this leads to one’s
welfare and happiness.
The Buddha repeated himself yet again: ‘It
was for this reason that we said do not accept
anything because of oral transmission…..or
out of respect for the teacher.
He continued: ‘Devoid of envy, ill will,
unconfused, clear and mindful, one imbues all
the directions and the entire world with loving
kindness, compassion, appreciative joy and equanimity
vast exalted and measureless.’
Taking a provisional view about the possibility
of rebirth, the Buddha then gives four assurances
to the Kalamas if they follow these teachings:
1. ‘If there is another world, and if
good and bad deeds bear fruit and yield results,
it is possible with the breakup of the body
after death, I shall arise in a heavenly world.
2. If there is no other world, no ripening or
fruit or rightly or wrongly done actions, then
here and now (ditthe dhamme), one remains happy,
free of negativity and ill will.
3. If evil happens to the doer (of it) then
since one does not intend evil towards anyone,
from where will suffering touch one who does
no evil action.
4. But if evil does not happen to the doer (of
it) then in any case, one can regard oneself
as pure.
He concluded: ‘A noble person is free
of negativity, ill will, uncorrupted and pure.’
ANALYSIS OF THE 10 CRITERIA
Jenny Wilks
The following list of the terms
in Pali and comparison of translations was compiled
by Jenny Wilks from the Dharma Facilitators
Programme.
She has listed below the literal translation
for each of the criteria showing that the first
four belong to the category of received or second
hand knowledge, then four examples of misguided
thinking and the final two show examples of
inappropriate reliance on authority figures.
Jenny then gives different examples of major
translations in various texts of the 10 Criteria.
The Ten Criteria in Pali and Translations:
1. Literal translation:
|
anussava |
‘repeated hearing’ |
|
parampara |
‘after another’ (or ‘from
other to other’) = series or succession |
|
iti-kira |
‘so it is reported’ |
|
pitaka-sampadana |
‘agreement with (or on the authority
of) scriptures’ |
|
takka-hetu |
‘because of logic’ |
|
naya-hetu |
‘because of inference’
|
|
akara-parivitakka |
‘careful examination of reasons’
|
|
ditthi-nijjhana-kkhanti |
‘forbearance with reflection
(or speculation) on views’ |
|
bhabba-rupata |
‘appearance of being capable’
(or of being possible) |
|
samano no garu-ti |
‘thinking “the recluse
is our teacher”’ |
1-4 = examples of received or second-hand knowledge
5-8 = examples of misguided thinking and reasoning
9-10 = examples of inappropriate reliance on
authority
Comparison of Four Translations:
1. Thanissaro Bhikkhu –
from website www.accesstoinsight.org
2. Soma Thera – ‘The Buddha’s
Charter for Free Inquiry’ BPS, Kandy (also
on website)
3. University of Rangoon Pali Department –
found at www.buddhism.ndirect.co.uk/kesaputt.htm
4. Woodward – ‘Book of Gradual Sayings’,
Pali Text Society.
| anussava: |
1. reports
2. repeated hearing
3. hearsay
4. report
|
parampara |
1. legends
2. tradition
3. what you have been told
4. tradition |
iti-kira |
1 traditions
2. rumour
3. –
4. hearsay
|
pitaka-sampadana |
1. scripture
2. what’s in a scripture
3. because it’s mentioned in scripture
4. proficiency in the collections |
takka-hetu |
1. logical conjecture
2. surmise
3. by reason of logic
4. mere logic
|
naya-hetu |
1. inference
2. an axiom
3. because of its method
4. inference |
akara-parivitakka |
1. analogies
2. specious reasoning
3. in consideration of the reasoning (being
plausible)
4. after considering reasons |
ditthi-nijjhana-kkhanti |
1. agreement through pondering views
2. a bias toward a notion that has been
pondered over
3. by tolerating the views based on speculation
4. after reflection on and approval of
some theory |
bhabba-rupata |
1. probability
2. another’s seeming ability
3. because of its appearance of possibility
4. because it fits becoming |
samano no garu-ti |
1. the thought ‘this contemplative
is our teacher’
2. the consideration ‘the monk is
our teacher’
3. because ‘our monk is venerable’
4. out of respect for a recluse (who holds
it) |
* Cf
Canki Sutta, MN95 includes 1,7 and 8 of the
Kalamas criteria (along with faith and preference)
in a list of five things that may turn out two
ways, i.e. they may lead to true or false conclusions.
|